In nature it is not symmetry that is difficult to achieve but asymmetry. However I won't disagree with your appreciation of the beauty in nature.
But lets not gloss over the barbarity and suffering that is ubiquitous in nature. The tiger may look beautiful but with every meal it kills another animal, literally eats it alive. It makes best use of its physiology and anatomy designed for hunting and killing prey.
If tigers didn't eat meat in the garden of Eden then why the claws and massive canines? Just wondering.....
In nature it is not symmetry that is difficult to achieve but asymmetry. However I won't disagree with your appreciation of the beauty in nature.
But lets not gloss over the barbarity and suffering that is ubiquitous in nature. The tiger may look beautiful but with every meal it kills another animal, literally eats it alive. It makes best use of its physiology and anatomy designed for hunting and killing prey.
If tigers didn't eat meat in the garden of Eden then why the claws and massive canines? Just wondering.....