Just about your entire previous post was ridicule, not a single substantive comment. Perhaps you need to reread it.
No, artificial and natural selection are not "different processes and outcomes." Evolutionists fool themselves by naming things the way they do. All that is different is the nature of the agent that brings about the selection. Anything that splits off a smaller population from a larger in such a way that prevents them from recombining is a form of selection. Some such events are drastic, such as founder effect and bottleneck -- very similar effect to intensive domestic breeding -- and classical natural selection itself can also be that drastic, in that only a small population will survive while the rest die as a result of environmental threat. There are less drastic selection processes such as migration of a large portion of a population, leaving a large portion, and genetic drift, for instance, which merely means the process takes a lot longer. But the end result is the same -- the development of a new phenotype along with reduced genetic variability.
As I said, think about it.
As for my having been an atheist giving me some credibility, it would seem to follow from your own belief that faith is a sign of incompetence. You don't seem to keep track of your own points very well.
Just about your entire previous post was ridicule, not a single substantive comment. Perhaps you need to reread it.
No, artificial and natural selection are not "different processes and outcomes." Evolutionists fool themselves by naming things the way they do. All that is different is the nature of the agent that brings about the selection. Anything that splits off a smaller population from a larger in such a way that prevents them from recombining is a form of selection. Some such events are drastic, such as founder effect and bottleneck -- very similar effect to intensive domestic breeding -- and classical natural selection itself can also be that drastic, in that only a small population will survive while the rest die as a result of environmental threat. There are less drastic selection processes such as migration of a large portion of a population, leaving a large portion, and genetic drift, for instance, which merely means the process takes a lot longer. But the end result is the same -- the development of a new phenotype along with reduced genetic variability.
As I said, think about it.
As for my having been an atheist giving me some credibility, it would seem to follow from your own belief that faith is a sign of incompetence. You don't seem to keep track of your own points very well.
Faith