According to evolutionary theory, penguins, chickens and emus are well suited to their environment by natural selection. According to creation, God created each thing well suited to its environment. But I guess you're saying that a clever God isn't allowed to be creative, and is not allowed to use wings for any other purpose than flying through air?
I admire such unusual creatures as penguins for showing how God can take a design pattern (bird) and put it in such an unexpected environment (aquatic). Compared to the evolutionary concept of gradual change, it's really "out there" and leaves no evidence behind for what would have to be a most interesting trail of intermediates.
I admire other creatures that are ridiculously out-of-place in comparison to others of their group. Bats and platypus among mammals. (Platypus at first regarded as a hoax by incredulous scientists back in Britain.) Flying fish.
According to evolutionary theory, penguins, chickens and emus are well suited to their environment by natural selection. According to creation, God created each thing well suited to its environment. But I guess you're saying that a clever God isn't allowed to be creative, and is not allowed to use wings for any other purpose than flying through air?
I admire such unusual creatures as penguins for showing how God can take a design pattern (bird) and put it in such an unexpected environment (aquatic). Compared to the evolutionary concept of gradual change, it's really "out there" and leaves no evidence behind for what would have to be a most interesting trail of intermediates.
I admire other creatures that are ridiculously out-of-place in comparison to others of their group. Bats and platypus among mammals. (Platypus at first regarded as a hoax by incredulous scientists back in Britain.) Flying fish.